Archive: 13 posts

---

I want to talk about how there should be no ambiguous (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ambiguous) thread names such as this topic (https://lbpcentral.lbp-hub.com/index.php?t=91255-ooooooooooooooooooo). The reason this is going to be important, if not, helpful to the moderators, admins, and general community it that instead of having a guess of what you're going to reply to or help with, you actually know what it's going to be about. I mean, you wouldn't want to accidentally go into a Horses-in-Bikinis Thread thinking that it was going to be a nice little discussion topic, now would you? If you're a person who can change the rules for the site then thanks you for taking the time to read!

2014-09-09 00:29:00 Author: ChrisUbi Posts: 22

---

We already don't allow spammy or ambiguous threads. Though when doing our rewrite we must have accidentally deleted it. lol Thanks!

2014-09-09 00:57:00 Author: jwwphotos Posts: 11383

---

I do think you should be a bit more proactive on this. Seen a few threads that had a bit too vague titles like "Help" or "Best idea ever". Should probably try and get them to do more descriptive titles. Maybe just change it for them and send them a pm

2014-09-09 01:09:00 Author: RockSauron Posts: 10882

---

Possibly!

2014-09-09 11:21:00 Author: jwwphotos Posts: 11383

---

That's a pretty ambiguous response, jjw...

2014-09-09 12:27:00 Author: DreadRandal Posts: 434

---

Good thing it isn't a thread title then, isn't it?

2014-09-09 14:03:00 Author: Doopz Posts: 5592

---

That's a pretty ambiguous response, jjw... Possibly!

2014-09-09 14:16:00 Author: jwwphotos Posts: 11383

---

Did we really need a link to the definition of "ambiguous"?

2014-09-09 15:40:00 Author: wally-217 Posts: 521

---

Did we really need a link to the definition of "ambiguous"? Possibly! Because jww didn't do it

2014-09-09 16:57:00 Author: RockSauron Posts: 10882

---

Did we really need a link to the definition of "ambiguous"? Absolutely! I'm not that good on English and I love fast access to a defenition if I'm lazy.

2014-09-09 19:35:00 Author: Seveni_7 Posts: 109

---

Absolutely! I'm not that good on English and I love fast access to a defenition if I'm lazy. If you have Chrome, use this extension (https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/google-dictionary-by-goog/mgijmajocgfcbeboacabfgobmjgjcoja). You just double click a word and get an instant definition.

2014-09-10 00:34:00 Author: Doopz Posts: 5592

---

All jokes aside,this rule just sounds to up-tight. It's more of a personal thing you don't like,then something that is ruining the whole websites you are allowed to have opinions, it's just if something doesn't spark your curiosity, then just ignore it. Simple as that. Sorry,but I'm saying no to this vote.

2014-09-18 01:47:00 Author: XX_sonicfan_XX Posts: 265

---

As the suggestion is already part of the rules package, I am locking this.

2014-09-18 01:49:00 Author: jwwphotos Posts: 11383

Posts: 1077139    Threads: 69970    Members: 9661    Archive-Date: 2019-01-19

Aus dem Archiv wurden alle persönlichen Daten wie Name, Anschrift, Email etc. - aber auch sämtliche Inhalte wie z.B. persönliche Nachrichten - entfernt.
Die Nutzung dieser Webseite erfolgt ohne Speicherung personenbezogener Daten. Es werden keinerlei Cookies, Logs, 3rd-Party-Plugins etc. verwendet.