Archive: 14 posts

---

I think it would be awesome to play a psp level at the ps3 even though it would be hard cause the 2 layer thing but I think It's possibe. See wouldn't you want to play that at lbp ps3? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1w4IBtlIXvQ And this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irAsWh8DucY&feature=related

2011-12-13 02:36:00 Author: Sunbunny23 Posts: 995

---

Ummm, when I want to play this, I just grab my PSP. >_>

2011-12-13 15:48:00 Author: nysudyrgh Posts: 5482

---

Ummm, when I want to play this, I just grab my PSP. >_> Yeah, me too... Wait, I don't have a PSP! Anyway, it would require a big update for LBP2 in order to recognize the content. And could end up with PSP DLC packs.

2011-12-13 17:39:00 Author: gdn001 Posts: 5891

---

Yeah, me too... Wait, I don't have a PSP! Anyway, it would require a big update for LBP2 in order to recognize the content. And could end up with PSP DLC packs. True but some psp dlc is cool like turbo level kit and uncharted costumes ( the psp uncharted not the lbp2 uncharted ) also I don't mind how big it will be I know that it is possible .

2011-12-13 20:49:00 Author: Sunbunny23 Posts: 995

---

But LBP2 and LBP PSP run on two completely different engines and have levels published on two different servers. Due to the engine difference, the physics in each game is slightly different, which could render some levels impossible. As has already been mentioned, it would also require downloading what is effectively an entire game, if you count all the unique PSP content. But last of all, it would require input on cambridge's part, who aren't actually working on LBP PSP anymore. It isn't likely, to say the least.

2011-12-14 07:50:00 Author: FlipMeister Posts: 631

---

But LBP2 and LBP PSP run on two completely different engines and have levels published on two different servers. Due to the engine difference, the physics in each game is slightly different, which could render some levels impossible. As has already been mentioned, it would also require downloading what is effectively an entire game, if you count all the unique PSP content. But last of all, it would require input on cambridge's part, who aren't actually working on LBP PSP anymore. It isn't likely, to say the least. I ment you could play lbp psp levels just like lbp2. The graphics and engine ( like lbp ps3 gameplay ). lbp1 is a diffrent engine you could tell by graphics and new tools. Also It's still possible Cambridge could let MM do that. After all Cambridge also helped MM for lbp ps3 games.

2011-12-14 11:45:00 Author: Sunbunny23 Posts: 995

---

LBP1 has the same core engine, only the graphics are different. The whole code fore LBP psp is different, so you couldn't play it on PS3. Also, the PSP game has bad graphics, which would look really lame on a HD TV. Finally, even Mm thinks they won't work on LBP anymore, appart from DLC. DLC doesn't mean rebuilding a whole game engine which can run PSP games. That's too much. However, I'm sad the Vita won't be able to play PS3 levels. I mean, the back touch could be the L2/R2/L3/R3 and the front touch the Move cursor. But it's again not the same engine (or is it ?) Also remember this : in terms of complexity, there's in order : 1) LBPPSP 2) LBP1 3) LBP2 and LBPVita Why would they add this feature ? Personally, I don't like the PSP one, it's lame. If you want to play it anyways, I recommend buying it BEFORE playing the other ones, or you'll regret.

2011-12-15 02:57:00 Author: Unknown User

---

LBP1 has the same core engine, only the graphics are different. The whole code fore LBP psp is different, so you couldn't play it on PS3. Also, the PSP game has bad graphics, which would look really lame on a HD TV. Finally, even Mm thinks they won't work on LBP anymore, appart from DLC. DLC doesn't mean rebuilding a whole game engine which can run PSP games. That's too much. However, I'm sad the Vita won't be able to play PS3 levels. I mean, the back touch could be the L2/R2/L3/R3 and the front touch the Move cursor. But it's again not the same engine (or is it ?) Also remember this : in terms of complexity, there's in order : 1) LBPPSP 2) LBP1 3) LBP2 and LBPVita Why would they add this feature ? Personally, I don't like the PSP one, it's lame. If you want to play it anyways, I recommend buying it BEFORE playing the other ones, or you'll regret. Graphics never matter. engine core of lbp1 diffrent. Not only the graphics but also gameplay changed a bit and don't forget about lbp2 tools. Psp is awesome. You just got to know everything to know about. If you don't like it cause 2 layers then your just picky lbp psp packs more with, online levels which you download so you play them offline, tools, ( new micro bomb ) and even glitches you want to have on ps3 but it's only on psp. Im not saying psp is better, Im just saying psp does not suck. pistons and bolts can go crazy but you got to tame it you can find how on psp tutorials "how to not let bolts and pistons go cookoo" lbp psp is lbp. cambridge helped mm with ps3 lbp and mm helped cambridge with psp lbp. I don't care what anyone thinks about "It won't work.", "graphics look terrible.", (again who cares about graphics) and even " I could just play psp levels on my psp." ( some people don't have lbp psp ) You see. This is made for people to agree who have or don't have lbp psp.

2011-12-15 23:28:00 Author: Sunbunny23 Posts: 995

---

Merging the two games isn't going to happen the upgrades to the engine from 1-2 caused some things to break when the old levels were played in the new game. Attempting to port an entirly different engine into LBP2 will just be a horrible mess. A stand alone HD port is possible, its been done with a few PSP games already but I doubt this would be one that gets the treatment. Depending on the model of the PSP you could just use the TV out function to play it on your TV.

2011-12-16 01:04:00 Author: Rabid-Coot Posts: 6728

---

LBP1 has the same core engine, only the graphics are different. The whole code fore LBP psp is different, so you couldn't play it on PS3. Also, the PSP game has bad graphics, which would look really lame on a HD TV. Finally, even Mm thinks they won't work on LBP anymore, appart from DLC. DLC doesn't mean rebuilding a whole game engine which can run PSP games. That's too much. However, I'm sad the Vita won't be able to play PS3 levels. I mean, the back touch could be the L2/R2/L3/R3 and the front touch the Move cursor. But it's again not the same engine (or is it ?) Also remember this : in terms of complexity, there's in order : 1) LBPPSP 2) LBP1 3) LBP2 and LBPVita Why would they add this feature ? Personally, I don't like the PSP one, it's lame. If you want to play it anyways, I recommend buying it BEFORE playing the other ones, or you'll regret. Yes, this. LBP?2 is LBPVita without touch controls(yet) and LBP?V/LBP?Touch is LBP?2 without PlayStation Move controls(yet).

2011-12-16 01:32:00 Author: Cronos Dage Posts: 396

---

I still say it's possible. Mm could just re-build them or some genorator to do that job. Why are you people disagree? I am tired. Suggestions is where you can suggest a idea. Don't bother disagreeing. To the people who can agree can comment only now. Besides why bother disagreeing if you people who disagree say the same thing over and over again.

2011-12-16 02:47:00 Author: Sunbunny23 Posts: 995

---

I still say it's possible. Mm could just re-build them or some genorator to do that job. Why are you people disagree? I am tired. Suggestions is where you can suggest a idea. Don't bother disagreeing. To the people who can agree can comment only now. Besides why bother disagreeing if you people who disagree say the same thing over and over again. You are disagreeing with our disagreeing so ... Anyway, if you suggest something, you'll always have people who disagree. So YOU don't bother making a post saying you don't want them here.

2011-12-16 12:43:00 Author: nysudyrgh Posts: 5482

---

You are disagreeing with our disagreeing so ... Anyway, if you suggest something, you'll always have people who disagree. So YOU don't bother making a post saying you don't want them here. Yes but don't forget that people want people to agree. Disagreeing is going to be a waste of time if people say it over and over again. It's obvious to people who say they disagree with this and that but they don't need to say the obvious thing over again I got it the first time. Im not trying to fight anyone Im just saying saying the same thing over and over is stupid. The people who post a sugesstion are not stupid when they read it the first time they don't need and want to read it again and some people who post a suggestion are like "jeez thanks captain obvious-_-" and it's annoying.

2011-12-18 03:02:00 Author: Sunbunny23 Posts: 995

---

Yes but don't forget that people want people to agree. Disagreeing is going to be a waste of time if people say it over and over again. It's obvious to people who say they disagree with this and that but they don't need to say the obvious thing over again I got it the first time. Im not trying to fight anyone Im just saying saying the same thing over and over is stupid. The people who post a sugesstion are not stupid when they read it the first time they don't need and want to read it again and some people who post a suggestion are like "jeez thanks captain obvious-_-" and it's annoying. No one here is disagreeing with you. You brought up a suggestion, and everyone else simply told you why it more than likely will not happen. Believe me, I want this to happen as much as the next guy, but some things just aren't going to happen.

2011-12-18 04:15:00 Author: WoodburyRaider Posts: 1651

Posts: 1077139    Threads: 69970    Members: 9661    Archive-Date: 2019-01-19

Aus dem Archiv wurden alle persönlichen Daten wie Name, Anschrift, Email etc. - aber auch sämtliche Inhalte wie z.B. persönliche Nachrichten - entfernt.
Die Nutzung dieser Webseite erfolgt ohne Speicherung personenbezogener Daten. Es werden keinerlei Cookies, Logs, 3rd-Party-Plugins etc. verwendet.