Archive: 31 posts

---

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWQTS8zqYXU Huh.... So, who else is going to grab some popcorn when the day comes? IMHO, I think they'll take it out for a month or less, and then when it comes back up, people will make a Facebook page celebrating Facebook's return. Want to place a bet?

2011-08-11 21:43:00 Author: CyberSora Posts: 5551

---

Ugh, everyone will have switched to Google Plus by then. Got my Xbox Live account hacked today funnily enough. They bought ?93.50's worth of crap on my card and then switched my location to Russia. All for the lulz I should think. How fun!

2011-08-11 22:23:00 Author: Kiminski Posts: 545

---

Its just a little part of Anonymous, and one video, if anything this is just a joke.

2011-08-12 01:22:00 Author: Charlemagne Posts: 513

---

So now people will finally get some work done? Sounds good to me.

2011-08-12 03:09:00 Author: midnight_heist Posts: 2513

---

So they have all our personal info do they? I wonder if they have fun sorting out what info's fake and what's true

2011-08-12 03:18:00 Author: SR20DETDOG Posts: 2431

---

Calm, Anonymous Says: "To the world's media,is a lie, we do not intend eliminate our own media,is not our style."

2011-08-12 04:06:00 Author: Pulparindo15 Posts: 334

---

I hope they know that if it wasn't for Facebook, Egypt would still be under Mubarak's rule. And I hope they know that they've probably got the CIA waiting for them should they decide to go forward with the hack...

2011-08-12 06:20:00 Author: Outlaw-Jack Posts: 5757

---

regardless of whatever its saying, the anonymous voice from their videos is super annoying

2011-08-12 06:39:00 Author: kuppokid Posts: 79

---

Can't watch the video on my ipod but Facebook was down briefly the other night, I was denied my 4am dose

2011-08-12 08:11:00 Author: Radishlord Posts: 706

---

I hope they know that if it wasn't for Facebook, Egypt would still be under Mubarak's rule. And I hope they know that they've probably got the CIA waiting for them should they decide to go forward with the hack... CIA can't do anything to Anonymous. Anonymous doesn't die. They will always be there and they will never be caught.

2011-08-12 08:24:00 Author: Whalio Cappuccino Posts: 5250

---

CIA can't do anything to Anonymous. Anonymous doesn't die. They will always be there and they will never be caught. As technology advances, so will the security that accompanies them. In due time, they'll be hunted down. One. By. One. Until all that's left is the empty suit and tie that started the movement. As anonymous as they come... they'll anonymously disappear.

2011-08-12 08:32:00 Author: Outlaw-Jack Posts: 5757

---

Rabid-Coot likes this.

2011-08-12 09:58:00 Author: Rabid-Coot Posts: 6728

---

$5 says they'll fail within a week XD

2011-08-12 22:23:00 Author: zzmorg82 Posts: 948

---

Pffft. I could live without Facebook. I only use it for gatherings, anyways. PSN on the other hand, was suicide-enducing. I suppose I support Anonymous' thinking, but I fail to see what this is to achieve. So... You take a site down for a little while, and it returns later on. Exactly what will be achieved in doing so? The personal information will still be there, I imagine.

2011-08-12 22:33:00 Author: Ostler5000 Posts: 1017

---

I hope they know that if it wasn't for Facebook, Egypt would still be under Mubarak's rule. And I hope they know that they've probably got the CIA waiting for them should they decide to go forward with the hack... Nope.avi It was the people who did it. They just used Facebook to communicate. If Facebook wasn't there, they could have used Tumblr, Skype, or anything else. regardless of whatever its saying, the anonymous voice from their videos is super annoying It's not their voice. They use a program that speaks for them, and they modify the pronunciation a little so you can understand it. CIA can't do anything to Anonymous. Anonymous doesn't die. They will always be there and they will never be caught. ^This. Anonymous isn't a group, it's an identity. You can take down its members now, but sooner or later others will rise. It's like saying you'll get rid of all the crime in the world; it's just impossible. Pffft. I could live without Facebook. I only use it for gatherings, anyways. PSN on the other hand, was suicide-enducing. I suppose I support Anonymous' thinking, but I fail to see what this is to achieve. So... You take a site down for a little while, and it returns later on. Exactly what will be achieved in doing so? The personal information will still be there, I imagine. They're not planning to take it down a few days. They plan to remove Facebook for good, which I find rather impossible to do because they can only highjack it until the admin(s) can regain control. What I find funny though is that nobody's going to use Facebook anymore. Think about it: -MySpace is popular in 2003 -Facebok is popular in 2007 -Google Plus is released in 2011 There's a 4 your gap in each of them. So if I'm correct, everybody will ditch Facebook for Google+ and life will continue how it is. Who knows; maybe we'll joke about Facebook like we do to MySpace.

2011-08-12 22:47:00 Author: CyberSora Posts: 5551

---

OH MY GOD! My brother didn?t stop to tell me that Anonymous were going to hack Facebook the fifth of november! I did not believe him, but now I have been warned!

2011-08-13 03:15:00 Author: ALEXhatena Posts: 1110

---

Rabid-Coot likes this. http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/9257/facebooklikebuttonbigu.jpg

2011-08-13 05:05:00 Author: CyberSora Posts: 5551

---

http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/3020/shrugponybigmacbymoonga.png There was a time when you didn't have to bend reality to take Anonymous seriously, perhaps with things like their Scientology attacks which, while still riding the line of anti-heroism, could at least be rallied behind. But then they start calling themselves the rulers of the internet. And in the same message, they declare that they want to take down... Facebook? Not BP's website? Not the Syrian government's network? Facebook? And you're saying this a MONTH before you actually go and do the thing? Do you know the insane amount of resources these guys have? Not to mention, of course, that they're designed for MASSIVE server load (think New Year's, Superbowl Halftime, Christmas, etc.) that not even the massive hive-mind of Anonymous could try to flood? This is on a date, mind you, that's astonishingly unimportant. Nothing happens on November 5th (besides Guy Fawkes day, hurr, silly symbolism. The English are just going to be outside setting fireworks anyways). Maybe they'd have better luck on some of those peak days I mentioned, although that would be more obstructive for the people who want to send messages for the holidays or to comment on important events. Which is funny, considering that half the time they blather about the freedom of information. But apparently the right of regular people to enjoy the internet goes out the window when it suits them. Because they're so high and mighty, and this is for our own good and that years later we'll thank them and blah blah blah. I could make a parallel here, but I think it'd be a bit extreme. Really? When did this game of charades begin? This isn't a revolution, this is a joke. Stop wasting our time, Anon. Come back when you've grown up again.

2011-08-13 05:22:00 Author: Astrosimi Posts: 2046

---

http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/3020/shrugponybigmacbymoonga.png There was a time when you didn't have to bend reality to take Anonymous seriously, perhaps with things like their Scientology attacks which, while still riding the line of anti-heroism, could at least be rallied behind. But then they start calling themselves the rulers of the internet. And in the same message, they declare that they want to take down... Facebook? Not BP's website? Not the Syrian government's network? Facebook? And you're saying this a MONTH before you actually go and do the thing? Do you know the insane amount of resources these guys have? Not to mention, of course, that they're designed for MASSIVE server load (think New Year's, Superbowl Halftime, Christmas, etc.) that not even the massive hive-mind of Anonymous could try to flood? This is on a date, mind you, that's astonishingly unimportant. Nothing happens on November 5th (besides Guy Fawkes day, hurr, silly symbolism. The English are just going to be outside setting fireworks anyways). Maybe they'd have better luck on some of those peak days I mentioned, although that would be more obstructive for the people who want to send messages for the holidays or to comment on important events. Which is funny, considering that half the time they blather about the freedom of information. But apparently the right of regular people to enjoy the internet goes out the window when it suits them. Because they're so high and mighty, and this is for our own good and that years later we'll thank them and blah blah blah. I could make a parallel here, but I think it'd be a bit extreme. Really? When did this game of charades begin? This isn't a revolution, this is a joke. Stop wasting our time, Anon. Come back when you've grown up again. Same could be said for Sony's sites, and look where that got us: 6 weeks with no PSN. They're NOT going to DDOS or temporarily put it offline; they're going to shutdown the site. While I'm still spectacle about how they'll do it, I wouldn't doubt Anonymous too much. These aren't the teenagers who raided for rights and game related lulz anymore; they're young men, some maybe reaching their 30s or more, and they've learned a LOT since the old /b/. If they were able to highjack the CIA's own site, then I'm not going to underestimate them on this operation. And on that note, I would just like to applaud you for your use of Big Macintosh here. I didn't think anybody would use him for a discussion like this, but it suits it well.

2011-08-13 07:48:00 Author: CyberSora Posts: 5551

---

I would like to see the madness and hysteria to see Facebook taken down. Maybe after one month people will understand again what are the priorities in life, my father first , and learn how to use an instrument in a wiser way.

2011-08-13 10:50:00 Author: OmegaSlayer Posts: 5112

---

I would like to see the madness and hysteria to see Facebook taken down. Maybe after one month people will understand again what are the priorities in life, my father first , and learn how to use an instrument in a wiser way. Facebook kids playing metal? *Shivers.* Don't scare me like that Omega!

2011-08-13 18:52:00 Author: CyberSora Posts: 5551

---

BUT FACEBOOK TELLS ,E WHERE BU ECT PART Y IS! SAeriouly though, this is stupi, **** you annoymous.,

2011-08-14 00:56:00 Author: Unknown User

---

BUT FACEBOOK TELLS ,E WHERE BU ECT PART Y IS! SAeriouly though, this is stupi, **** you annoymous., I'm just curious Alex, are you actually p*ssed or is this a joke?

2011-08-14 00:58:00 Author: abyssalassassin Posts: 717

---

Whatt? ? 10cxhar

2011-08-14 01:02:00 Author: Unknown User

---

Point taken.

2011-08-14 01:08:00 Author: abyssalassassin Posts: 717

---

I rather disapprove of them trying to shut down Facebook actually. But since I never did have an account in Facebook, I could care less.

2011-08-14 01:42:00 Author: Unknown User

---

They're NOT going to DDOS or temporarily put it offline; they're going to shutdown the site. While I'm still spectacle about how they'll do it, I wouldn't doubt Anonymous too much. These aren't the teenagers who raided for rights and game related lulz anymore; they're young men, some maybe reaching their 30s or more, and they've learned a LOT since the old /b/. If they were able to highjack the CIA's own site, then I'm not going to underestimate them on this operation. And on that note, I would just like to applaud you for your use of Big Macintosh here. I didn't think anybody would use him for a discussion like this, but it suits it well. Thank you Well, I won't presume to be an expert on /b/ and Anon or if they will succeed in their operation or not. I remain skeptic, but weirder things have happened before... Although I doubt Facebook's proprietors wouldn't find some way to get the site back online even if Anon nuked their servers or soemthing. A lot of money runs on it. But these do not seem to be the same people who made up the 'old' /b/. If it were, I'd expect a different tone. But if the passage of time had given the more skill, it would have also given them an inkling of maturity. I mean, their goals sound more mature, but to me it really just seems like a silly conspiracy theory disguised with pseudo-revolutionary rhetoric (the government is using Facebook to spy on you, so we'll shut them down and restrict communications flow, harhar). IMO, this sounds like a new generation of kids trying to fill in the shoes of those guys who've decided to move on from the movement. Or you could be right and they just went terribly insane from the amount of power they had. Who knows. We'll see what happens Nov. 5!

2011-08-14 01:46:00 Author: Astrosimi Posts: 2046

---

BUT FACEBOOK TELLS ,E WHERE BU ECT PART Y IS! SAeriouly though, this is stupi, **** you annoymous., I'm just curious Alex, are you actually p*ssed or is this a joke? Drunk Alex, meet Abyssalassassin. Abyssalassassin, meet Drunk Alex.

2011-08-14 08:17:00 Author: Whalio Cappuccino Posts: 5250

---

"Remember, Remember, the Fifth of November, the gunpowder, the treason, the plot." In my honest opinion, I don't think Anonymous is going to do anything more than slow down Facebook for a few hours or so, then everything will be back to normal. I don't think they have the abilities to take down Facebook for good, seeing as how big the website really is... But, I suppose we'll just have to wait until then to see if they really do anything. Their determination is just crazy though >.>

2011-08-17 23:00:00 Author: Gamerman50 Posts: 72

---

They can't **** it up as much as UCAS is ****ed up at the moment... I just want to accept my Uni offer :'(

2011-08-18 09:30:00 Author: Unknown User

---

I've hear this (http://www.slashgear.com/anonymous-disowns-operation-facebook-attack-talks-continue-11171129/) revelation, so I feel as if the attacks are unlikely. At least I hope they're not going through with them. I mean, I'm not sure if most of anonymous "disown" the attacks it really makes them unofficial, but it makes sense. Since anon more and more have been fighting for "good" (in a broad sense) recently, it means they must have some standards to which something should comply before it is considered to be supported by anonymous. However, since the Op Facebook hackers are using the anonymous pseudonym, are they not part of anonymous? Or should we say the split opinion amongst anon makes them separate factions? I suppose in time we must judge who truly represents anon by the amount of support they gain (my money is on the non-Op Facebookers) and and whether they manage to take Facebook down or not. Also, this may seem a silly question, but do they mean taking down Facebook during November 5th or indefinitely?

2011-08-18 16:36:00 Author: thecatreturns123 Posts: 84

Posts: 1077139    Threads: 69970    Members: 9661    Archive-Date: 2019-01-19

Aus dem Archiv wurden alle persönlichen Daten wie Name, Anschrift, Email etc. - aber auch sämtliche Inhalte wie z.B. persönliche Nachrichten - entfernt.
Die Nutzung dieser Webseite erfolgt ohne Speicherung personenbezogener Daten. Es werden keinerlei Cookies, Logs, 3rd-Party-Plugins etc. verwendet.