Archive: 12 posts

---

What did you guys think about the verdict? Do you think she was guilty or not guilty? I didn't think she was guilty. The jury had to be sure, beyond a reasonable doubt, that this mother killed her daughter. There was reasonable doubt. The prosecution’s case was not strong enough. In the end, you can’t convict someone just because the idea of what could’ve possibly happened is repulsive. You have to convict based on the cold, hard facts. This case was lacking in those. p.s. Is this too controversial?

2011-07-07 02:19:00 Author: wolverine_2008 Posts: 304

---

Thank you for being intelligent enough to know that. Seriously, some people are being utter idiots about it! also : "A free nation would rather 100 criminals go un-punished, than 1 innocent person deemed guilty"

2011-07-07 03:37:00 Author: theswweet Posts: 2468

---

I haven't been keeping track of everything they've said/found, but it's hard to say IMO. Maybe the reason they dumped her in a swamp and waited 31 days before calling anyone, is because she did murder her, or her dad did it, or they were both scared and panicked. But, I don't think she did it.. Because, there are some really sick people in this world, but how can a mother kill her own child? I don't thinks so...

2011-07-07 06:18:00 Author: Unknown User

---

I don't think it's over yet. If I were the judge and/or prosecutors, I'd demand that the case should be more thoroughly investigated before resting on a verdict. It's obvious that this case is lacking concrete details and facts. Well then, they ought to look a bit deeper then and find those facts, huh? I don't believe that she's innocent, but I cannot say that she's guilty. For now, I think the case should be put on suspension and be revisited once the prosecutors have solid information. Who knows? They might find their answers after all.

2011-07-07 06:23:00 Author: Outlaw-Jack Posts: 5757

---

I don't think it's over yet. If I were the judge and/or prosecutors, I'd demand that the case should be more thoroughly investigated before resting on a verdict. It's obvious that this case is lacking concrete details and facts. Well then, they ought to look a bit deeper then and find those facts, huh? I don't believe that she's innocent, but I cannot say that she's guilty. For now, I think the case should be put on suspension and be revisited once the prosecutors have solid information. Who knows? They might find their answers after all. But the verdict has been delivered. And the law says you can't be charged more than once for the same crime. So even if they did find more sold concrete evidence, then what would they do? They can't charge her for Caylee's murder again because she was already deemed innocent for that. I haven't been keeping track of everything they've said/found, but it's hard to say IMO. Maybe the reason they dumped her in a swamp and waited 31 days before calling anyone, is because she did murder her, or her dad did it, or they were both scared and panicked. But, I don't think she did it.. Because, there are some really sick people in this world, but how can a mother kill her own child? I don't thinks so... Everyone reacts differently to shock. There was this one video I saw, about a mother that found her son beheaded in his trailer, and when she called the police she sounded extremely calm. Maybe Casey Anthony just went through a major shock phase and couldn't bare to tell the police her daughter went missing.

2011-07-07 07:04:00 Author: wolverine_2008 Posts: 304

---

Yeah, I know, it's possible I really don't think she did it though..

2011-07-07 07:14:00 Author: Unknown User

---

I absolutely think she's guilty. I know, there wasn't enough evidence to put her in jail, but I think many of us know/think that our legal system is flawed. Even though (In my opinion) it is pretty good considering how complicated/impossible it would be to come up with a legal system that put away every single criminal and every single non-criminal wasn't put away. But that's a bit off-topic...

2011-07-07 12:23:00 Author: EvasiveSpoon Posts: 119

---

Because, there are some really sick people in this world, but how can a mother kill her own child? I don't thinks so... I agree it is hard to believe a mother could do something like that, but unfortunately there have been several mothers in recent years that did just that. This whole case is nutty in my opinion. To me, someone in that family is guilty of something and think it a horrendous crime there is a dead little girl that may never have justice for her death. Who waits a month before reporting their daughter is missing? ...I dunno, maybe I am a wrong, but I thought she was guilty from what I had seen (partying like nothing had happened etc, evidence of chloroform found in her trunk), but then again I wasn't on the jury and listened to everything.

2011-07-07 12:48:00 Author: jwwphotos Posts: 11383

---

Who waits a month before reporting their daughter is missing? ...I dunno, maybe I am a wrong, but I thought she was guilty from what I had seen (partying like nothing had happened etc, evidence of chloroform found in her trunk), but then again I wasn't on the jury and listened to everything. That was what I was talking about when I said everyone reacts to shock differently, maybe that's just how she dealt with it? I mean she did get molested by her father, I think.

2011-07-08 00:05:00 Author: wolverine_2008 Posts: 304

---

Been in Orlando for the past week... It's been all over every other channel! Honestly, I haven't heard enough about evidence to determine a answer. The one thing I picked up on was her reaction to it all; she remained to... :| about the whole thing. Get Derren Brown to watch her throughout, he'll crack this case, LA Noire style.

2011-07-08 02:17:00 Author: Nurolight Posts: 918

---

Whether she is guilty or not, her daughter's life is taken and nothing can change that sadly. I don't see why people are "freaking out" over the verdict. Its like people didn't know the way our judicial branch was built =/

2011-07-08 06:17:00 Author: Snrm Posts: 6419

---

The story is definately sketchy, especially given the fact that it was proven she was lying on multiple accounts related to the incident, as is the rather convenient revelation of her supposedly being molested by her father (which doesn't really have much relevance unless someone was setting up the "mentally/emotionally disturbed" card) and the rather cold non-reception her mother gave her immediately after she was acquitted. It's true there was enough to cast reasonable doubt but then again "reasonable doubt" isn't the same as "innocent." Although I wouldn't count on the full truth behind things ever being revealed, I'm willing to bet her life won't exactly be sunshine and roses from now on whether she really did it or not.

2011-07-09 02:47:00 Author: Dapiek Absaroka Posts: 512

Posts: 1077139    Threads: 69970    Members: 9661    Archive-Date: 2019-01-19

Aus dem Archiv wurden alle persönlichen Daten wie Name, Anschrift, Email etc. - aber auch sämtliche Inhalte wie z.B. persönliche Nachrichten - entfernt.
Die Nutzung dieser Webseite erfolgt ohne Speicherung personenbezogener Daten. Es werden keinerlei Cookies, Logs, 3rd-Party-Plugins etc. verwendet.