Archive: 5 posts

---

I thought for sure this would work until I tried it. I wish that there was a way to put a positional sequencer on another positional sequencer for fine tuning. For example, as you get closer to 100 your application requires that you have more specificity between 90 and 100%. So you have your regular conditions on the positional sequencer, then another positional sequencer that takes up the last ten percent of the first sequencer, that you can then divide into ten sections to be more precise. The only work around I found was to make the sequencer 100 blocks long (which is ridiculous). Does anyone agree?

2011-05-29 20:40:00 Author: shane_danger Posts: 283

---

I agree. It would be helpful for those who frequently use sequencers but for the rare users I see it would make not much difference.

2011-05-29 21:50:00 Author: craigmond Posts: 2426

---

You could try the tools in my "Analogue Logic Toolset". There are comparison tools there like less than, equals to and roughly equals to. Then you can use batteries set at 91%, 92% etc. to compare your signals. For even more accuracy you could use timers (connected so they are off) set at a certain % of the way through. A word of caution - it outputs analogue values of 0% or 100%, not digital values, so you'll have to convert it to digital if you need that (only needs a single sequencer with a battery on it though).

2011-05-29 23:14:00 Author: thor Posts: 388

---

I agree. It would be helpful for those who frequently use sequencers but for the rare users I see it would make not much difference. I agree, most will not use it that way, but it just feels like something that should work in that way. I was pretty surprised when it didn't. You could try the tools in my "Analogue Logic Toolset". There are comparison tools there like less than, equals to and roughly equals to. Then you can use batteries set at 91%, 92% etc. to compare your signals. For even more accuracy you could use timers (connected so they are off) set at a certain % of the way through. A word of caution - it outputs analogue values of 0% or 100%, not digital values, so you'll have to convert it to digital if you need that (only needs a single sequencer with a battery on it though). So cool that you responded. I actually use your zero latency logic probe on a daily basis! It's probably my most valuable tool. I'll check out your toolset. That might have what I need in it. I think you'd be interested in what we're trying to build as well - if you want to check it out sometime I'll invite you.

2011-05-30 01:29:00 Author: shane_danger Posts: 283

---

It makes sense I guess, because that 2nd positional sequencer would need it's own set of analog outputs to control it, maybe have a separate microchip with outputs that activates when the sequencer reaches that point, and disables the outputs for the original sequencer. And when you go back down below 90%, it switches the controls back. I can try to experiment with this in my free time and let you know if I can come up with anything.

2011-06-26 00:00:00 Author: sp0ngyraver Posts: 407

Posts: 1077139    Threads: 69970    Members: 9661    Archive-Date: 2019-01-19

Aus dem Archiv wurden alle persönlichen Daten wie Name, Anschrift, Email etc. - aber auch sämtliche Inhalte wie z.B. persönliche Nachrichten - entfernt.
Die Nutzung dieser Webseite erfolgt ohne Speicherung personenbezogener Daten. Es werden keinerlei Cookies, Logs, 3rd-Party-Plugins etc. verwendet.