Home    Site Stuff    Site Feedback
#1

Petition to Uncensor a Word

Archive: 59 posts

I noticed this while posting in a thread the other day that the word G.A.Y.

I'm not sure if anyone will really pay attention to such a request in one of the more obscure forum topics, but I feel it's worth a try.

Censoring that word is like censoring the word Asian, or Mexican. They are not insulting words, and their only purpose are to identify people who come from Asia or Mexico. Of course, there are people who will use it in a bad way, as if the word contained some negative meaning in identifying someone. It's like the word fat, which has been used so negatively, we've replaced it with "large" or "overweight".

"Ga.y", however, is not a bad word at all. I don't see how "Lesbian" isn't censored. We don't see many people, especially on this forum, who insult each other by calling them that, or fat, or some racial slurs. I feel that by uncensoring this word, the world will be at least .01 percent less homophobic.

FREEDOM OF SPEECH FOR ALL!		2010-04-29 03:35:00

Author:
Voodeedoo
Posts: 724

(If you didn't know.) There was a giant thread discussion about this along time ago, which coincidentally involved a petition by dawesbr to uncensor it. ConfusedCartman eventually locked the thread and said that it would remain censored, and that his mind was made up.2010-04-29 04:01:00

Author:
Incinerator22
Posts: 3251

I didn't know; he really locked a thread requesting to uncensor a word? That's like not allowing anyone to have a voice, but I wouldn't know; maybe the thread got out of hand.

Did anyone post a reason why he wouldn't uncensor it?		2010-04-29 04:22:00

Author:
Voodeedoo
Posts: 724

Is this the thread you meant?
https://lbpcentral.lbp-hub.com/index.php?t=18024-Unreasonable-wordfilter

Because in that thread, it was another word that was discussed.		2010-04-29 04:39:00

Author:
Gilgamesh
Posts: 2536

Is this the thread you meant?
https://lbpcentral.lbp-hub.com/index.php?t=18024-Unreasonable-wordfilter

Because in that thread, it was another word that was discussed.

That's the one -- my bad. A very similar topic nonetheless.



"Ga.y", however, is not a bad word at all. I don't see how "Lesbian" isn't censored.

I personally think it should be censored and you're missing the point of why it was censored. That word has many meanings:

1: homosexual
2: happy
3: stupid/pointless/annoying etc...

Because the definition number three there is so negative and widespread, your word is censored.		2010-04-29 05:35:00

Author:
Incinerator22
Posts: 3251

And a *** is a little white paper stick that you smoke in Europe.

Words are meaningless without context. A computer cannot sensor context so you censor the word. If you change your grammar to use gaily in instead of *** you should be OK. If you are actually referring to same-sex life partners in a non disparaging way, then I suggest you use the phrase "genitally similar partners", which won't flag the censorship roles.

Lastly, being *** to *** people is normal, so you SHOULD be able to substitute the word normal for the word *** and be OK as well.

I hope this helps.		2010-04-29 06:01:00

Author:
RoharDragontamer
Posts: 397

And a *** is a little white paper stick that you smoke in Europe.

Words are meaningless without context. A computer cannot sensor context so you censor the word. If you change your grammar to use gaily in instead of *** you should be OK. If you are actually referring to same-sex life partners in a non disparaging way, then I suggest you use the phrase "genitally similar partners", which won't flag the censorship roles.

Lastly, being *** to *** people is normal, so you SHOULD be able to substitute the word normal for the word *** and be OK as well.

I hope this helps.

WOOT! Turns out this post totally proved my point!!		2010-04-29 06:02:00

Author:
RoharDragontamer
Posts: 397

Unfortunately, the word in question is often used more as a slur than to indicate someones sexual preference. This is why the filter is in place, and why I believe CC has been unwilling to lift it. If you need to use the word, there are many others that can be used to indicate the same thing.2010-04-29 06:27:00

Author:
Burnvictim42
Posts: 3322

HA!, like people are gonna use it decently!

If you wanna be so "Politically correct" and want to reffer to homosexuals, then call them homosexuals, and if you reffer to happy, call them happy, as simple as that, or don't tell me you're too lazy to type a longer word?

Srry m8, but i agree to this being kept censored as it will be majorly misused and only a person or two would be using it non-insultingly.
So...no, i don't think its a good idea to uncensor.
Besides, like i said, there's no definition to ***" that foesn't have another word you can use, as far as i know.		2010-04-29 06:37:00

Author:
Silverleon
Posts: 6707

just say gey instead.2010-04-29 06:48:00

Author:
DJKrimz
Posts: 187

I don't see why ****** is censored. It's not censored on LBP, but it is here!

Everyone on this site will play or have played LBP, and therefore will occasionally see people say *******, but why is it censored here?

Although maybe keeping g** censored makes sense...		2010-04-29 16:10:00

Author:
Doopz
Posts: 5592

Yes, I think we should move to the LBP censoring model, I'm fed up of having mrsuper******** flaunting his disgusting name in my face all day long 2010-04-29 16:17:00

Author:
rtm223
Posts: 6497

[QUOTE=rtm223;452136]************************************************** ************************************************** *************************************/QUOTE]

Fixed that for you- 		2010-04-29 16:21:00

Author:
Syroc
Posts: 3193

I don't think that the word *** necessarily needs to be uncensored. *** has a lot of meanings, and for me, the most popularly used is its negative definition. I don't see why it needs to be uncensored when there are multiple other words that can describe the same sexual preference.2010-04-29 19:43:00

Author:
qrtda235566
Posts: 3664

I noticed this while posting in a thread the other day that the word G.A.Y.

I'm not sure if anyone will really pay attention to such a request in one of the more obscure forum topics, but I feel it's worth a try.

Censoring that word is like censoring the word Asian, or Mexican. They are not insulting words, and their only purpose are to identify people who come from Asia or Mexico. Of course, there are people who will use it in a bad way, as if the word contained some negative meaning in identifying someone. It's like the word fat, which has been used so negatively, we've replaced it with "large" or "overweight".

"Ga.y", however, is not a bad word at all. I don't see how "Lesbian" isn't censored. We don't see many people, especially on this forum, who insult each other by calling them that, or fat, or some racial slurs. I feel that by uncensoring this word, the world will be at least .01 percent less homophobic.

FREEDOM OF SPEECH FOR ALL!

I see your point. Just a quick question though, when you used the word, in what context were you using it in?		2010-04-29 20:11:00

Author:
standby250
Posts: 1113

Just to be honest, when I and my friends use the words, I don't think we ever use it in the sense that it is suppose to be used for. In fact, the word doesn't really mean what it did five years ago. Words like these change meanings so much and right now it is a demeaning term. Actually, I love a recent episode of South Park that talked about how *** (that's f.a.g. if that was censored) didn't mean homosexual anymore. I personally understand the censorship as it these words aren't use to classify people, their used as insults.2010-04-29 20:17:00

Author:
shebhnt
Posts: 414

Honestly I see no use for that word around here. If someone for whatever reason did want to divulge that they are *** there is many other ways of doing it than the word ***. I think as it has been said the word almost doesn't even mean what it is supposed to anymore, not that homosexuality was its original meaning either! I think it's just one of those words, it rolls off the tongue and something about that appeals to the mainstream. Funnily it has gone from happy and positive to just about anything negative. I think that is reason enough to have it censored as it's probably going to be used to convey something negative 99% of the time.2010-04-29 20:58:00

Author:
OneEyedBanshee
Posts: 1370

I think it's discrimintation to censore that word! There are other words ppl use to insult others like muppet, mofo, git and others like that and they are not censored! If you want to insult someone that is no problem since there are enough words and possiblities but a word that defines us gets censored. I think that is hypocritical because if you censore one word that has two different meanings you have to do that with all the other words aswell! It's not even an option to write it wrong so it's not getting censored because I even got a warning for doing so yesterday and even if it would be ok for this word it would still be discrimination and that is against the forum rules if I remember right!2010-04-29 23:01:00

Author:
Chrree
Posts: 554

@ Chrree

I see your point, but really, only like 1 out of 50 people would use it for its correct term, the other 49 would use it in a baad/ insulting matter.

My guess as why its sencored is because of the high amount of times and how commonly it is misused.

I mean, be honest with me, how many people use the term "***" to reffer to homosexuals or meant as in "happy"?

Ok, now how many times has it been used as a term to insult something or someone or used in a bad way?

Get what i'm saying now?

Its not to discriminate against gays ( see? if it was to discriminate against gays, the word "gays" would be censored, but as you can see, you can use the term "gays" because it can only be used for its proper meaning), but to prevent one of the words mostly used in a bad term from being over-used in the site m8.		2010-04-29 23:11:00

Author:
Silverleon
Posts: 6707

It would be really dumb if this forum went with the same filtering system as the lbp game itself.
"Hey there what's ********* (happening) over there. Anyway, I'm ******** (entering) this competition I seen on the ******** (computer)...

Even my friend mnimmo1986 gets his name censored on lbp... What the heck is offensive there? According to Urban dictionary, "nim" is a bad word... If the lbp system goes by urban dictionary... What the ****...		2010-04-29 23:18:00

Author:
KQuinn94Z
Posts: 1758

@Silverleon
When you offend someone and the word gets censored it doesn't matter because the other one understands it out of the context. Tell me why the word git doesn't get censored and why is there any difference to the word muppet? If someone calls you a muppet that always has a bad meaning.		2010-04-29 23:57:00

Author:
Chrree
Posts: 554

When we make the decision to filter a word, we are filtering it based on its most common meaning. Not what it could mean or what it should mean, but what it almost always does mean. Does that sometimes result in poor censoring? Yes, it does. Is there a better solution? Not that I'm aware of.

Look, the fact of the matter is that we don't create the climate of the internet. If a homosexual man or woman signs on to LBPCentral and discovers that we censor the word "***", I would hope that they place the blame in the right place: the immature and the insensitive who use that word as a slur in the first place. It's an absolute travesty that the word "***" has become a common slur, but we still need to treat it as such because that's what it is in the hands of the "internet society" in general. The second it stops being used by the majority as a means of offending others, I will remove it from the censor without a second thought. Until then, the censorship of the word "***" (along with any other words seen as potentially offensive by the general public) will continue in order to keep LBPCentral open to as large a community as possible.		2010-04-30 00:54:00

Author:
ConfusedCartman
Posts: 3729

Then the other words mentioned should be censored too because that is only fair and logical.2010-04-30 01:36:00

Author:
Chrree
Posts: 554

@Silverleon
When you offend someone and the word gets censored it doesn't matter because the other one understands it out of the context. Tell me why the word git doesn't get censored and why is there any difference to the word muppet? If someone calls you a muppet that always has a bad meaning.
To be honest, I've never heard muppet or git (whatever that means) as an insult.

Then the other words mentioned should be censored too because that is only fair and logical.

Muppet and git should be censored? Maybe they aren't because they aren't terms used that often in America, though are they really slurs? I don't think we need to ban the word "idiot" just because it has a bad meaning, however, using *** in a negative context is potentially very offensive to homosexuals. It reminds them that there's a part of society that doesn't accept them, even if it is used in a totally different context.		2010-04-30 03:11:00

Author:
qrtda235566
Posts: 3664

Then the other words mentioned should be censored too because that is only fair and logical.

Chrree, you're not getting it.

Furst off, i have no idea what a "git" is, and if someone called me a muppet i'd laugh as i've never seen it used in a negative way, what CC, myself and some other people here are traying to say its that those words are rarely or never used in a negative way, you're the first person i've ever seen who know they're in any way negative.
Now "***" is misused in an extremely high rate, people use it a lot in a lot of places in a negative matter.

And i'm sorry, but because of the many idiots out there, the word "***" now has more of a negative meaning than it was intended to.

Do you understand what we're trying to say.

Its not JUST because it has a double meaning, but because its MOSTLY usd in a negative way rather than a positive one on contrast to other words with multiple meanings, which are mostly used in a non-negative way.

Please try to understand.		2010-04-30 03:46:00

Author:
Silverleon
Posts: 6707

Maybe americans don't know git (since it only seems to be a british swearword) but I heared muppet several times when I was chatting at Home on PS3.

The point is that *** still is the official word for it in addition to homosexuall and I think it's just wrong to look at the missuse instead of the real meaning of it. Well but since there are so many great straights who don't have the problem with words about them getting missused so they don't accept my complaints I'll just shut up! If the word "straight" ever becomes a swearword I bet no one wants it to be censored!		2010-04-30 04:27:00

Author:
Chrree
Posts: 554

I heared muppet several times when I was chatting at Home on PS3.

-Well, there are many idiots there m8, i wouldn't be surprised to anything thy say there...

The point is that *** still is the official word for it in addition to homosexuall.
- Thechnically only "homosexual" is official.

and I think it's just wrong to look at the missuse instead of the real meaning of it.
Its not that we're just trying to see the misuse, its that we see what most people use it for, that's all.

If the word "straight" ever becomes a swearword I bet no one wants it to be censored
- i'm pretty sure if it "straight" becomes majorly misused like the word "***" (note that "gays" is still untouched) then it would , or at least should be censored as well.
!

Thank you for understanding. 		2010-04-30 04:40:00

Author:
Silverleon
Posts: 6707

I agree with Chree, I believe you all underestimate the maturity of the forum members here, the VAST majority are mature enough and sensible enough to not use this word for anything than it's proper meaning (non-insult).2010-04-30 06:09:00

Author:
Boomy
Posts: 3701

I agree with Chree, I believe you all underestimate the maturity of the forum members here, the VAST majority are mature enough and sensible enough to not use this word for anything than it's proper meaning (non-insult).

I believe the problem does not fall with the old long-lasting members, which (most) are indeed mature enought o not misuse it, but with the newer members which aren't as "mature" per-say, haven't you seen the battelfield this site has been lately?

The word "***" would probably be the most used word in the site within a week of uncensoring.

And no i'm not saying ALL new-members are immature or all old members are mature, i'm just saying that for what i've seen at least, there have been an increase of more immature users, that's all.		2010-04-30 10:01:00

Author:
Silverleon
Posts: 6707

Water bottles are often used at a device to smoke hemp from, but it's still legal for people to possess water bottles on their property.
/not the best example.

Maybe there could be some sort of rule against the misuse of the word, kind of like the same things that happen to people who upload photos of their nude meats onto the site, if there isn't already. I'm not really going to continue trying to turn heads because I know no one's going to change their mind.

PS: "*******" is uncensored. Please don't ban me.

EDIT: Not anymore, whoooo		2010-05-01 05:25:00

Author:
Voodeedoo
Posts: 724

Why isn't slagathor censored?2010-05-01 23:32:00

Author:
Incinerator22
Posts: 3251

It may be a sexual orientation to describe people who have feelings for their own gender, but people DO use it as an insult and it IS offensive when someone uses it as such. That's why it is censored.

That's why the English Language made different words to describe the same thing.		2010-05-01 23:52:00

Author:
DarkFray
Posts: 100

Of course, there are people who will use it in a bad way, as if the word contained some negative meaning in identifying someone. It's like the word fat, which has been used so negatively, we've replaced it with "large" or "overweight".


There. You said it yourself and thus making your point wrong (ironically). Just stop trying to use the "g" word, and move on to something else, like all the examples given to you.		2010-05-02 00:33:00

Author:
CyberSora
Posts: 5551

I wish g** was still only used as "happy" .2010-05-02 00:50:00

Author:
Frinklebumper
Posts: 941

@CyberSora
If you would be homosexuall you wouldn't say that.		2010-05-02 12:55:00

Author:
Chrree
Posts: 554

God,
and to think some people think I am small minded.
If there is one word that should be uncencored its the word ***.

I can understand a word like anusinvader is cencorred, but the word g a y...
cmon.

0_o omg, that word is not cencorred,
but g a y is.

Common sense is totally failing me atm lol.		2010-05-02 14:02:00

Author:
Luos_83
Posts: 2136

That's nice of you. :-)2010-05-03 15:15:00

Author:
Chrree
Posts: 554

Stop teh arguments! Theres an obvious reason why its censored so theres no point arguing the obvious, the word is censored because of the misuse and not because of the uncommon uses so lets just let this thread fade into obscurity please!

Honestly! How can you not see that?		2010-05-03 16:44:00

Author:
Kern
Posts: 5078

The point is that it still is discrimination no matter what reason you have to censore it.2010-05-03 17:20:00

Author:
Chrree
Posts: 554

It's quite simple to see the objection here. Unlike the majority of the censored words here, this is the word that the majority of homosexual people use to define themselves. Ever heard of homosexual pride? No, it's *** pride. However, the reasons for censoring are also very plain and it's not as though it is a word for which censoring inhibits communication, so it's not a word that is particularly needed. It's also rather melodramatic (and wholley inaccurate) to call its censorship "discrimination".

As ever, I'm not really interested in censorship, but I understand the "need" for it within society and at the end of the day, it's up to the admins to decide which words are or aren't. CC has listened to the points put forward and has stated his position on the matter...		2010-05-03 17:45:00

Author:
rtm223
Posts: 6497

lol @ luos, anusinvader.

all I wonder is why **** (D.A.M.N sorry for the bypass but you know now what word I mean) is censored...afaik it doesn't mean anything badly.		2010-05-03 17:54:00

Author:
oldage
Posts: 2824

There. You said it yourself and thus making your point wrong (ironically). Just stop trying to use the "g" word, and move on to something else, like all the examples given to you.

But fat isn't censored and his point was that it can be used in a good or bad way, the same as ***, which is censored.

I remember someone saying the that one of the meanings of *** meant stupid or something in modern times... then why isn't stupid censored? Surely it's just as offensive.		2010-05-03 18:30:00

Author:
S-A-S--G-U-N-R
Posts: 1606

People arnt going to use it sensibly and why would you use a word like that on a Little Big Planet website.

Personally ive never noticed.

And if you want to say *** then just say homo or homosexual. :/		2010-05-03 19:47:00

Author:
Jovuto
Posts: 2345

we could also censor **** and ************ to, along with ***** and *************. but i can see why g*a*y is censored (sorry for bypass). it's a shame that it has become a slur and an insult as it really shouldn't be. but i agree with other users, just use another word or maybe you could be creative:

Guns
Are
Yellow

see? creatively done (i'm kidding, of course). now as for d*a*m*n (bypass!), i see no problem with that. it's not a curse nowadays, more of a large concrete wall designed to keep water at bay.

oh yeah, and i really wouldn't say homo. that's almost, literally on the verge of becoming an insult. i hear it quite often used as an insult. but yeah, say homosexual. it's not censored and you sound like an intellectual. win win!		2010-05-03 20:03:00

Author:
trip090
Posts: 1562

more of a large concrete wall designed to keep water at bay.

You mean a dam? They're spelt differently .

But seriously ****** shouldn't be censored.		2010-05-03 20:05:00

Author:
Doopz
Posts: 5592

You mean a dam? They're spelt differently .

i know . but you get the picture. we don't use it as a really strong curse word any more. i'm not even sure it is a curse word any more.		2010-05-03 20:08:00

Author:
trip090
Posts: 1562

There. You said it yourself and thus making your point wrong (ironically). Just stop trying to use the "g" word, and move on to something else, like all the examples given to you.

Fat is uncensored.

Stupid, dumb, or idiotic aren't censored. They don't even contain GOOD meanings. G*y being censored is an example of harsh censorship.

Might as well censor FLAT because it can describe women offensively, or WET because people can say "wanna get wet?", or MOM because people can make a yo momma joke and some abnormally sensitive people will be deeply offended.

And since this seems to be censored for the sensitivity of people who AREN'T *** but will be called that anyway for the sake of lulz, why not uncensor it for the sensitivity of g*y people?

We need to get our **** straight.		2010-05-04 10:33:00

Author:
Voodeedoo
Posts: 724

Just to be honest, when I and my friends use the words, I don't think we ever use it in the sense that it is suppose to be used for. In fact, the word doesn't really mean what it did five years ago. Words like these change meanings so much and right now it is a demeaning term. Actually, I love a recent episode of South Park that talked about how *** (that's f.a.g. if that was censored) didn't mean homosexual anymore. I personally understand the censorship as it these words aren't use to classify people, their used as insults.

Kids don't seem to use it wisely because society's turn into something untrue. And South Park changed the word f.a.g to something else, but even if, it's a tv show, and it was influential enough to have a lasting impact on the new generation of idiotic, dumb children who won't have a thought capacity any more complex than a seventh grader.		2010-05-04 10:43:00

Author:
Voodeedoo
Posts: 724

[QUOTE=rtm223;452136]************************************************** ************************************************** *************************************/QUOTE]

Fixed that for you-

this reminds me of thath episode of southpark
201		2010-05-04 15:07:00

Author:
Unknown User

well you guys just ain't getting it, the problems are much greater than the good it would cause2010-05-04 15:40:00

Author:
Kern
Posts: 5078

Isnt that just an assumption,
for all you know the lbpc community might use that word with the respect it deserves.

In the netherlands the word homo is actually more offensive than the word ***		2010-05-04 17:06:00

Author:
Luos_83
Posts: 2136

Urgh, here we go again.

I honestly don't see why the hell words like *** and **** are censored...I mean, ok, little american kids will use '***' as an insult occasionally...

But ****? seriously? It's still censored? Because I have never, ever heard of anyone who has found any tiny part of that word offensive it any way. That's total bollocks.

EDIT: And actually, isn't the fact that '***' is censored really quite homophobic?		2010-05-04 17:45:00

Author:
ARD
Posts: 4291

Until then, the censorship of the word "***" (along with any other words seen as potentially offensive by the general public) will continue in order to keep LBPCentral open to as large a community as possible. so..
These should all be censorred?

Warning, lots and lots of uncencorred stuff used as example to make a point.

Anal
Analinvader
Bottombutcher
Fudgepacker
Poof
Carpetmuncher
Dyke
Lesbo
Lezzie
Queer
Queerbait
Queerhole
TwatWaffle
Mcfagget
Retard
M0tard
Niglet
SnickerSnacker
buttplugger
asspirate
Beaner
BackBurner
Muffdiver
Blowjob
Polesmoker
Bollocks
Coon
Cumtard
Kike/Kyke
Poonani
Punta
Woodpecker
Backyard Bomber
BrownBrewer
Cumdumpster


So.. yea..
its so justified to censor ***.		2010-05-04 18:30:00

Author:
Luos_83
Posts: 2136

so..
These should all be censorred?

Warning, lots and lots of uncencorred stuff used as example to make a point.

Anal
Analinvader
Bottombutcher
Fudgepacker
Poof
Carpetmuncher
Dyke
Lesbo
Lezzie
Queer
Queerbait
Queerhole
TwatWaffle
Mcfagget
Retard
M0tard
Niglet
SnickerSnacker
buttplugger
asspirate
Beaner
BackBurner
Muffdiver
Blowjob
Polesmoker
Bollocks
Coon
Cumtard
Kike/Kyke
Poonani
Punta
Woodpecker
Backyard Bomber
BrownBrewer
Cumdumpster


So.. yea..
its so justified to censor ***.
No, we'd just hand out an offensive content infraction to whoever decided to use those words. Look, you're missing the point of the censorship filter entirely - it's not there to do our job for us by filtering every offensive word conceivable, it's there to make our job easier by catching and removing the most commonly used expletives. That keeps site staff dealing with issues that actually require a person with critical thinking skills to make disciplinary decisions.

Also, let me be clear: this is one of the extremely rare occasions that using words like that will not get you silenced. The only reason I'm allowing it here is because you put it in spoiler tags and you added a warning before it. Don't expect to get away with it anywhere else.

Edit: I went ahead and deleted that quote spam that was getting started. If you're going to post, feel free to do so, but at least contribute something valuable to the conversation. Quoting someone and saying "I agree!" or "That's right!" or anything to that tune is essentially reposting what they've already posted, and it mucks up the thread and accomplishes nothing else.		2010-05-04 19:11:00

Author:
ConfusedCartman
Posts: 3729

Dont worry CC,
I understand and wont use those words anywhere else,
So the warning was not needed, but understandable.

I just wanted to make a point.
A good one for once 		2010-05-04 19:15:00

Author:
Luos_83
Posts: 2136

I just wanted to make a point.
A good one for once

Really? It's painfully obvious why not every single obscure and vaguely offensive word in every permutation of it's morphology is not filtered. It doesn't demonstrate anything or add any weight to the already flimsy argument that this, or any other word, needs to be uncensored. Yes, automated censorship systems aren't perfect, far from it. Well done for working that out all by yourself


Personally, I couldn't care less what is and isn't censored. Most of the censored words are in my everyday vocabulary (hell, one of them is even a perfectly acceptable contraction of my own name), but anyone can see that the censorship system is there for a reason and at the end of the day, the decision for what should or shouldn't be censored is completely subjective. Just be glad that this is a site where the staff actually bother to listen to the concerns of the userbase, and respond in a reasonable manner, even if they don't always agree.		2010-05-04 19:29:00

Author:
rtm223
Posts: 6497

If you gotta describe something as Ga y, just say lame or derp.... if want to talk about someone being a homosexual, just say he was a homosexual..
not really needing to be uncensored in my honest opiion.		2010-05-04 22:07:00

Author:
Joshofsouls
Posts: 1569

You must really dislike me rtm,
always trying to put me down.		2010-05-05 15:13:00

Author:
Luos_83
Posts: 2136

In my honest opinion, there's no reason for *** to be censored. But, when you really think about it, what's the point in trying to persuade CC to uncensore it? He's already made his mind up and the chances are, he's going to stick with it. Just let it go, it's really not a big deal.

Really, you should all be complaining to Mm about LBP's censoring, that's much, much worse...		2010-05-05 16:29:00

Author:
Doopz
Posts: 5592


LBPCentral Archive Statistics
Posts: 1077139    Threads: 69970    Members: 9661    Archive-Date: 2019-01-19

Datenschutz
Aus dem Archiv wurden alle persönlichen Daten wie Name, Anschrift, Email etc. - aber auch sämtliche Inhalte wie z.B. persönliche Nachrichten - entfernt.
Die Nutzung dieser Webseite erfolgt ohne Speicherung personenbezogener Daten. Es werden keinerlei Cookies, Logs, 3rd-Party-Plugins etc. verwendet.