Archive: 25 posts

---

I know that I'm the only one who thinks that way cause it seams as the movie was made for me. It's freaking brilliant! So what do you think of that movie? Leave a star rating, max is 5 stars and the lowest is 1 star. I rate it: :star::star::star::star::star::star::star::star::s tar::star::star::star::star::star::star::star::sta r::star::star::star::star::star::star::star::star: :star::star::star::star::star::star::star::star::s tar::star::star::star::star::star::star::star::sta r::star::star: I'm the TC, I'm allowed to break the rules

2010-04-21 23:09:00 Author: blizzard_cool Posts: 752

---

What i've seen so far (53:32) its a good movie, wouldn't call it THE BEST, but its pretty good i'll give it that, so far my rating is 4/5 I may change my rating when i finish it tho.

2010-04-21 23:17:00 Author: Silverleon Posts: 6707

---

I wouldn't say its the best but its had good ratings from my friends ( critics cant be trusted) and it has a new idea that nobody's used before so i give it 4 stars since i haven't seen it.

2010-04-22 01:32:00 Author: orang3dragon612 Posts: 243

---

orang3dragon612 why would you rate something you haven't seen?! I seen it today and it was fantastic, love love loved it! 5 stars yes please!

2010-04-22 01:49:00 Author: OneEyedBanshee Posts: 1370

---

We can rate movies we haven't seen now?? I haven't seen it either, so I'm going to go ahead and give it a 1 star. The acting was terrible, the action sequences were really dull, and that one part with the guy's pants, and the balloons, and the rocket turtle? Seriously, that was the craziest thing I've ever seen. Actually I take it back, 5 stars. No, 50. Give it all the stars!

2010-04-22 05:20:00 Author: Teebonesy Posts: 1937

---

Haha. I did absolutely love it... but but calling it the best film ever would only make sense if you haven't seen many good films

2010-04-22 09:15:00 Author: rtm223 Posts: 6497

---

This has got to be my favourite movie i loved it so much lol, but its sad at the end but i wont spoil anything.

2010-04-22 09:46:00 Author: lbpholic Posts: 1304

---

I've seen many movies but this one really appealed to me. I went into the cinema not expecting much and came out blown away. It's the movie's style that I like so much, it's dark and **** up and jet it so **** funny and has great (mostly epic) characters.

2010-04-22 09:57:00 Author: blizzard_cool Posts: 752

---

It was ok not the best super hero movie and it should have been called Hit Girl since Kick A*** is lame in the movie till the Spoiler END lol

2010-04-22 11:52:00 Author: Mike0_o Posts: 51

---

I had an alright time. It was a pretty fun movie? I don't feel extremely in either direction. I'm certainly not about to bash it, though I didn't really agree with much of how they handled it. But I didn't love it either. I saw it at the ghetto theater down the street, and I'd say it was worth the 8 bucks. The young girl was surprisingly amazing. I think she's 13? I looked her up and it looks like she's mostly a voice actor, but she did a fantastic job here, sort of stole the show anytime she was onscreen.

2010-04-23 08:30:00 Author: Teebonesy Posts: 1937

---

This has got to be my favourite movie i loved it so much lol, but its sad at the end but i wont spoil anything. I assume you're referring to the rocket turtle? Sad indeed... Haven't gotten around to seeing it yet and I don't know that I will. The trailers never really appealed to me and the controversy upon its release isn't really pushing me one way or another either. According to one credible source, the film will hit Blu-ray and DVD on June 30. I can wait two months...

2010-04-23 13:35:00 Author: supersickie Posts: 1366

---

The controversy mainly comes down to the fact that you've got a 12-year old girl violently murdering people. Without any worry about the repercussions. I mean, I understand the movie's satire, but the early stuff the movie has to say about violence and what it means to be a superhero - pretty realistic and somewhat gritty and unexpected and very interesting stuff - is completely, totally thrown out by the movie's end. I'm just sayins! If you're going to PRETEND to have a message, you'd better at least stick with it. Maybe the movie should be called "Half-***"? I don't know, I've never read the book so I have no idea how that really handled it, but I did see one cover showing a certain character battered and bloody and nearly dead - it's a grisly cover, not fun at all - and the text is along the lines of "Grisly violence, just the way you like it!!" That sort of 4th-wall breaking schadenfreude joke didn't feel to me like remotely a part of the movie, which set out to glorify the same violence it appears to condemn early on. You do see that sort of stuff in "Funny Games", but I didn't find it in this movie. If this was the source of Kick-***'s satire, then it really only went halfway. Even Unbreakable, of which I'm seriously NOT a fan, at least stuck to its guns. Out of all the "subversive" comic book movies - The Incredibles, Watchmen, Unbreakable, Kick-*** - I would say Kick-*** is firmly at the bottom of the heap in terms of telling its message effectively. This doesn't necessarily KILL the movie. You can still go in and have a fun enough time watching a very colorful action flick and munching on popcorn. But the entire point the movie's trying to make essentially falls to pieces by the end and that's what we're left with - a colorful action romp with lots of glorious *** kicking. This is obviously going to appeal to some people and frustrate others.

2010-04-23 20:51:00 Author: Teebonesy Posts: 1937

---

Ok, i'm 14 years old, 15 in 2 weeks and i really badly want to see this, but i can only go with my mum since my friends are away. My mum will be able to stand the violence and the gore and the langauge, but what i'm worred about is if the sexual content will be a big roadblock. Can anyone that's seen it please tell me if there is much sexual content, and if it's bad or fine? I really just wanna see it but i don't think i can if the sexual content is too much.

2010-04-23 23:05:00 Author: Bluetoes1 Posts: 98

---

Haha. I did absolutely love it... but but calling it the best film ever would only make sense if you haven't seen many good films lol, indeed *cough*Avatar*cough* Well,anyways, i finally finnished it today, and well, it was ok, a little bit of "meh", a little bit of Wow, like i said, not bad, but not the best one ever either, i stick to my 4/5 rating.

2010-04-23 23:18:00 Author: Silverleon Posts: 6707

---

Ok, i'm 14 years old, 15 in 2 weeks and i really badly want to see this, but i can only go with my mum since my friends are away. My mum will be able to stand the violence and the gore and the langauge, but what i'm worred about is if the sexual content will be a big roadblock. Can anyone that's seen it please tell me if there is much sexual content, and if it's bad or fine? I really just wanna see it but i don't think i can if the sexual content is too much. The sexual content is, it's there, but they don't SHOW anything. The girls constantly show cleavage and one girl is naked while the guy is giving her a tan? But she's covering her twins with her hands, lol. They also cuss quiet a bit, and at one point they get it on but once again, nothing is shown. In all honesty I wouldn't go with your mom.

2010-04-23 23:48:00 Author: Whalio Cappuccino Posts: 5250

---

I agree with whaaaaaale here they don't show anything they talk about it and do it but nothing that you havent seen in a 12 movie i don't think,

2010-04-24 00:14:00 Author: lbpholic Posts: 1304

---

Hahahahaha... Ooooh boy. There's one scene people are forgetting about here. The sex scenes are NOTHING to worry about if you're going with your mom. They're very wholesome, clean sex scenes. If you're A) 14 years old, and B) trying to avoid awkwardness with your mom, it's the masturbation scenes you want to worry about.

2010-04-24 10:09:00 Author: Teebonesy Posts: 1937

---

No. Because that honour goes to The Blues Brothers, and always will.

2010-04-24 10:14:00 Author: Unknown User

---

Oh lol i forgot about those scenes their not that nad there funny if anything lol.

2010-04-24 19:42:00 Author: lbpholic Posts: 1304

---

Probably even more funny if your mom is sitting right next to you. If by "funny" you mean "eyeball-gougingly awkward".

2010-04-24 20:33:00 Author: Teebonesy Posts: 1937

---

Hey guys, just a friendly reminder that talk about piracy, whether it be games, software, or movies is prohibited on the forums. Please refrain from encouraging or assisting with that behavior. Thanks!

2010-04-24 20:50:00 Author: mrsupercomputer Posts: 1335

---

OK - We saw this on Sunday afternoon. Wow... In answer to the OP: No - not the best movie ever. But a darn good one. The controversy really is warranted as there is a 12 year-old sociopathic girl who steals a lot of the scenes, and the movie as reference to the source material or as a message on violence, really does get lost. But as a tongue-in-cheek, over-the-top comedy/action/thriller, it is very satisfying. I thoroughly enjoyed the show.

2010-04-27 12:44:00 Author: v0rtex Posts: 1878

---

The controversy really is warranted as there is a 12 year-old sociopathic girl who steals a lot of the scenes Meh, I don't really see a problem with it. I mean, Hit Girl has nothing on sociopathic vigilante characters like Rorschach and The Comedian from The Watchmen and TBH, I don't see her age as being a significant issue. The fact that the writers/directors/actors managed to pull off the character, that could so easily have been completely cringeworthy, and do it well is something to applaud, not condemn. I'm sure that plenty of people would disagree with me, but the "Child+violence+'bad' language = BAD" reaction seems like a bit of a knee-jerk thing here. What exactly is it people are afraid of here? the movie as reference to the source material or as a message on violence, really does get lost.. Was it supposed to have a message? IDK, I haven't read the comics, but surely they are pretty similar, what with the comics / screen play being written together. Actually, has anyone here read the comics? And if so, what are they like?

2010-04-27 13:15:00 Author: rtm223 Posts: 6497

---

Meh, I don't really see a problem with it. I mean, Hit Girl has nothing on sociopathic vigilante characters like Rorschach and The Comedian from The Watchmen and TBH, I don't see her age as being a significant issue. The fact that the writers/directors/actors managed to pull off the character, that could so easily have been completely cringeworthy, and do it well is something to applaud, not condemn. I'm sure that plenty of people would disagree with me, but the "Child+violence+'bad' language = BAD" reaction seems like a bit of a knee-jerk thing here. What exactly is it people are afraid of here? No, I agree with you here - so perhaps "warranted" was the wrong choice of word. My point is that those who would criticize the movie for it's gratuitous violence will further be fueled (and presume themselves justified) by the character's age and gender. But I'm not siding with the knee-jerk reactionists. Was it supposed to have a message? IDK, I haven't read the comics, but surely they are pretty similar, what with the comics / screen play being written together. Actually, has anyone here read the comics? And if so, what are they like? yeah, I don't really know either. This remark was based on several reviews that I read.

2010-04-27 13:31:00 Author: v0rtex Posts: 1878

---

I haven't read the comics either, but this is something that was interesting to me watching it. Undoubtedly, especially early on, there's a pretty clear point of view. "bad *** comic book violence" is not just unrealistic, but dangerously unrealistic. And as far as the point of view of the comic book, there is this cover: http://imgur.com/KJ1Hr.jpg Now I can say pretty clearly that the heavy dosage of anti-schadenfreude satire on display here is WAY watered down in the movie, and by the end of it completely dissolved into another gloriously violent comic book action flick. If the comic book revels in the violence later, as the movie does, is there a clearer condemnation of it, as there is on this issue's cover? Beats the crap out of me! But it was NOWHERE NEAR the movie I saw. A fun action flick it may have been, but nuance was not part of the equation.

2010-04-28 08:29:00 Author: Teebonesy Posts: 1937

Posts: 1077139    Threads: 69970    Members: 9661    Archive-Date: 2019-01-19

Aus dem Archiv wurden alle persönlichen Daten wie Name, Anschrift, Email etc. - aber auch sämtliche Inhalte wie z.B. persönliche Nachrichten - entfernt.
Die Nutzung dieser Webseite erfolgt ohne Speicherung personenbezogener Daten. Es werden keinerlei Cookies, Logs, 3rd-Party-Plugins etc. verwendet.