General Stuff #1
who is better? Lady ga ga or Michel Jackson
Archive: 68 posts
MMMMMMMMM............Thay would be a tough one i would say both  | 2010-01-16 22:30:00 Author: selky  Posts: 30 |
| IN all honesty? Lady Ga Ga is no lady, and MJ was a pedo. So they both suck Metal FTW. | 2010-01-16 22:40:00 Author: Unknown User  |
| There's only one way to find out... FIIIIIIIIIGHT!!! | 2010-01-16 22:42:00 Author: Rabid-Coot  Posts: 6728 |
| They're both crap. | 2010-01-16 22:47:00 Author: GruntosUK  Posts: 1754 |
| They're the same people! | 2010-01-16 22:59:00 Author: bonner123  Posts: 1487 |
| Lady Ga Ga ..? Who is Lady Ga Ga? Does that answer you question?  | 2010-01-16 23:21:00 Author: dajdaj03  Posts: 1486 |
| Better at what! | 2010-01-16 23:23:00 Author: IceMaiden  Posts: 1057 |
| I hate both. | 2010-01-16 23:25:00 Author: PurpleAddiction  Posts: 119 |
| Thriller thriller! Micheal Jackson i guess | 2010-01-17 14:23:00 Author: Doopz  Posts: 5592 |
| Both really annoying.......... | 2010-01-17 14:24:00 Author: Mod5.0  Posts: 1576 |
| Lol you're all very nice people aren't ya? | 2010-01-17 14:26:00 Author: Doopz Posts: 5592 |
| IN all honesty? Lady Ga Ga is no lady, and MJ was a pedo. So they both suck Metal FTW. Ditto @ this. | 2010-01-17 15:12:00 Author: Ungreth  Posts: 2130 |
| IN all honesty? Lady Ga Ga is no lady, and MJ was a pedo. So they both suck Metal FTW. Prove it... | 2010-01-17 15:35:00 Author: KQuinn94Z  Posts: 1758 |
| Hohoho.....wow, just wow. This thread is wrong for so many reasons...Its like comparing stool samples... Musicwise however, Michael Jacksons is definitely on top. | 2010-01-17 17:43:00 Author: Zwollie  Posts: 2173 |
| Jackson just got Lucky. Lady Gaga has already put out more hits than Michael Jackson has. But anyway, we all know Taylor Swift is the best, so why does this thread even exist? | 2010-01-17 17:50:00 Author: qrtda235566 Posts: 3664 |
| lady ga ga is so cool! she so waky!!! ugh.. please dont make me chose bettween them... please.. Also all of her songs have reached number 1 on the charts in the U.K i think... so... eh.. You should have compared her to madona. I mean its just unfair! micheal jackson was a legend! | 2010-01-17 18:02:00 Author: Tawarf Posts: 457 |
| Jackson just got Lucky. Lady Gaga has already put out more hits than Michael Jackson has. But anyway, we all know Taylor Swift is the best, so why does this thread even exist? MJ will release another hit. Just you watch. Oh...wait... | 2010-01-18 17:22:00 Author: adlingtont Posts: 321 |
| http://i48.tinypic.com/122yauc.jpg .................................................. | 2010-01-18 17:27:00 Author: ARD Posts: 4291 |
| Lol ARD, but jacko has a bit of a disadvantage here methinks... | 2010-01-18 17:30:00 Author: rtm223  Posts: 6497 |
| *cries* How could you all speak about Michael in that way....? *sniffles* | 2010-01-18 17:40:00 Author: XOAcireXO  Posts: 57 |
| I find it funny how all the people who get so saddened by the Pedo's death didn't even know who he was until he died... And that rules him out. And Lady GaGa is just a freak with no talent. She just has people in a studio who can make her sound good. I could go and sing, they could make me sound amazing. Then all i have to do is mime live, and i'll be famous. She's also crap. | 2010-01-18 17:44:00 Author: Unknown User |
| I find it funny how all the people who get so saddened by the Pedo's death didn't even know who he was until he died... Are you seriously suggesting these people had never heard of Michael Jackson?? | 2010-01-18 17:52:00 Author: ARD Posts: 4291 |
| Alright, I'll weigh in from a somewhat objective point of view. Lady Gaga, or whatever her real name is, was actually a very talented musician and singer before she adopted this persona. I don't know exactly why she has decided to go bonkers, but it's working for her. That said, I think her music is just another fad that will fade away. Her music is catchy, but shallow, and young people eat it up. Give it a few years and she will slide back into the shadows. As for me, I understand why people like her music, but I'm not one of them. I don't think she will be one of the all-time greats. Michael Jackson was a huge phenomenon for many, many years, and will go down as one of the greatest pop-stars of all time. His actions outside of music are regrettable, but do nothing to detract from his music. What he has [supposedely] done (yeah, like it's a question) is downright deplorable, but what parents would allow their children to sleep with Michael Jackson in the first place? I place blame on those parents as well. As twisted as Jackson was, he couldn't do it alone. For the record, I somewhat enjoy Michael Jackson's music, and I would definitely have to say he is a better musician than Lady Gage - no question. Remember, Top 40s/Pop radio stations do not report what is the best overall music as determined by the whole world, rather by the youth of our times. There are far more people who dislike Lady Gaga than those who like her. | 2010-01-18 18:30:00 Author: comphermc  Posts: 5338 |
| Alright, I'll weigh in from a somewhat objective point of view. Lady Gaga, or whatever her real name is, was actually a very talented musician and singer before she adopted this persona. I don't know exactly why she has decided to go bonkers, but it's working for her. That said, I think her music is just another fad that will fade away. Her music is catchy, but shallow, and young people eat it up. Give it a few years and she will slide back into the shadows. As for me, I understand why people like her music, but I'm not one of them. I don't think she will be one of the all-time greats. Michael Jackson was a huge phenomenon for many, many years, and will go down as one of the greatest pop-stars of all time. His actions outside of music are regrettable, but do nothing to detract from his music. What he has [supposedely] done (yeah, like it's a question) is downright deplorable, but what parents would allow their children to sleep with Michael Jackson in the first place? I place blame on those parents as well. As twisted as Jackson was, he couldn't do it alone. For the record, I somewhat enjoy Michael Jackson's music, and I would definitely have to say he is a better musician than Lady Gage - no question. Remember, Top 40s/Pop radio stations do not report what is the best overall music as determined by the whole world, rather by the youth of our times. There are for more people who dislike Lady Gaga than those who like her. Thats what I like about you comph...what I say with 2 odd sentences, you can completely dissect and expand upon to turn it into THE final word. Hats off to you, sir. | 2010-01-18 18:36:00 Author: Zwollie Posts: 2173 |
| lady ga ga is..... so nuts (in a bad way) i mean see her outfits and u know what a mean. en MJ yeh he's creepy and weird but i love his music. | 2010-01-18 18:43:00 Author: Smelling-Cowboy  Posts: 668 |
| First of all if you're comparing the two you're an idiot. Second - MJ left us with a lot of songs we've not yet heard but that Sony plan on releasing over the coming years. | 2010-01-18 19:13:00 Author: BasketSnake  Posts: 2391 |
| better in what?? music? dancing? drinking? (bed?) since they're both musicians, I'll go for MJ, his music is so much better for me. | 2010-01-18 19:13:00 Author: oldage  Posts: 2824 |
| lets see one **********s to little boys and the little boys ********** to the other ( that was kinda bad )Lady Gaga is a complete attention grabbing hog, he self appointed herself the jesus of w/e her music is (crap on a loop) (kudos to anyone who caught the joke in there) MJ on the other hand was a sensation what he did in his later years will never out weigh his massive musical footprint EDIT: anyone else notice how a ton of stars died at the age of 50 in '09? | 2010-01-18 20:46:00 Author: Littlebigdude805  Posts: 1924 |
| No, i'm suggesting that as far as his music was concerned they had never heard of him. Most of them only knew Beat it because of the Fallout Boy version... Which was also crap. But yeah, i meant all the teenagers who decided they would mourn the loss of the 'king of pop' when they had never heard any of his music prior to his death. There were loads of them.... | 2010-01-18 22:22:00 Author: Unknown User |
| Yup, I'm sick of things like when MJ's brother said he's "the greatest entertainer of all time" and thousands of people were cheering. Not that Lady Ga Ga is much better, but she's just a freak in her performances, not in the real world. I'd go with Lady GaGa I guess. | 2010-01-18 22:25:00 Author: Incinerator22  Posts: 3251 |
| Jackson just got Lucky. Lady Gaga has already put out more hits than Michael Jackson has. But anyway, we all know Taylor Swift is the best, so why does this thread even exist? Yo awesomemans, taylors good and all, and imma let you finish But Iron Maiden is the best of all time. All time. I'm sorry, I had to.  | 2010-01-20 00:20:00 Author: creelers  Posts: 275 |
| Yo awesomemans, taylors good and all, and imma let you finish But Iron Maiden is the best of all time. All time. I'm sorry, I had to. I'm sorry for how wrong you are. Taylor Swift is the best musician ever. EVER! Besides Justin Bieber. Anyways, for all of you saying that Michael Jackson had no impact because he was a pedophile, well, look at the imprint L. Ron Hubbard made. L. Ron Hubbard was a murderer, a conspirator against the US government, and, best of all, a SCIENCE FICTION WRITER. Even so, people take Scientology seriously and see L. Ron Hubbard as a prophet even if he would tie children up and throw them overboard or keep them in cages for weeks on end. Even if he was obviously just manipulating people for his own gain (he declared "Fair Game", where anyone who "tries to suppress or damage Scientology or a Scientologists. He said that these people who were "Fair Game" could be destroyed by any Scientologists by any means) he's still got tons of followers. The difference between him and Michael Jackson? Michael Jackson made music, his decisions being separate from the art he's producing, and L. Ron Hubbard tried to teach people morals and show them how to live, which he's clearly no good at from his own decisions. | 2010-01-20 02:56:00 Author: qrtda235566 Posts: 3664 |
| Hmm I had to go and thank every single one of AlexW's posts simply because, I agree entirely with them. Oh and comph, however, Lady GaGa might be a good singer, but why on earth hide it under all those effects and strange appearances? It just kind of bothers me. Michael Jackson was obviously a better musician, but METAL is still the best. xD  | 2010-01-20 03:12:00 Author: iGotFancyPants  Posts: 1355 |
| Yes, thats a very tricky question. I would have to go with Michael Jackson, I listen to his songs alot more. | 2010-01-21 07:22:00 Author: Ainsl3y_xo  Posts: 478 |
| What? How can you compare the two? MJ's music is far superior in almost every way. | 2010-01-24 04:52:00 Author: TheJollyRajah  Posts: 466 |
| What? How can you compare the two? MJ's music is far superior in almost every way. Tis true! Lady Gagaga did nothing special. I would say she is "special" | 2010-01-24 16:53:00 Author: Pantyer2  Posts: 652 |
| How can anyone take this thread seriously? It is now changed. Iron Maiden v Metallica. Go | 2010-01-24 23:22:00 Author: Unknown User |
| Michel Jackson | 2010-01-25 06:27:00 Author: Unknown User |
| Michel Jackson Did you not read my post? It is now Iron Maiden v Metallica | 2010-01-25 17:10:00 Author: Unknown User |
| Iron Maid...I mean Metal...hmmm, to be honest....that is a though one for me... | 2010-01-25 17:33:00 Author: Zwollie Posts: 2173 |
| Michael Jackson wins by default. And Metallica wins because I haven't heard a song by Iron Maiden. It's not fair, but that's the way life is. | 2010-01-25 17:36:00 Author: Syroc Posts: 3193 |
| Lady Gaga... and RAMSTEIN!!!! | 2010-01-25 18:07:00 Author: Kern  Posts: 5078 |
| This thread is amazing. Even though most people evidently hate both musicians, they're still talking the biggest load of ignorant bull-poopz ever. Both are pretty gifted musicians/performers... whether you like it or not. Its something you just can't deny. They are among the most well known people in history, up there with Hitler and Jesus... again, whether you like it or not. Awesomemans made a good point, probably the only educated post so far anyways enough taking this seriously, who's Michel Jackson anywayz x_x | 2010-01-25 22:47:00 Author: Pitcard  Posts: 779 |
| MJ is up there in history because he died, lady GaGa is just weird. I don't think anyone will remember her in 15 years... Some people deserve to be remembered, some don't. She doesn't. Jimmy Sullivan does, but no one will remember him either, so why should she be remembered for being distinctly average? | 2010-01-25 22:51:00 Author: Unknown User |
| I've got a grudge against popular music. don't know why... I just like to explore all kinds of music instead of just listening to what everyone else is listening. So i'll vote no for both. | 2010-01-25 22:58:00 Author: Yarbone  Posts: 3036 |
| neither, theyre both trannies and they both love little kids | 2010-01-25 23:56:00 Author: Charlemagne  Posts: 513 |
| Ozzy is god :hero: | 2010-01-26 00:01:00 Author: Incinerator22 Posts: 3251 |
| thats quite a bad way to put it, Sexuality doesnt define talent, and often Transexuality is something you are born with, there has been no evidence to suggest Michael Jackson being transexual, and any way i happen to know a transexual, and they are misunderstood and bullied. | 2010-01-26 00:02:00 Author: Kern Posts: 5078 |
| they still both suck. if it were Nirvana or The Jimi Hendrix Experience thad be a hard decision. we arent going to get many choices with a guy that became a girl and a black guy that poisoned his skin with radiation so that he could become white. the world is going mad, pretty soon itll be miley cyrus or the jonas brothers,ugh! | 2010-01-26 00:13:00 Author: Charlemagne Posts: 513 |
| Michael Jackson slept with children though, but whether anything more than that happened or not we'll probably never know. And he dangled a baby off a balcony 0.0 . | 2010-01-26 00:21:00 Author: Incinerator22 Posts: 3251 |
| I ask you hydraulic to find a solid piece of evidence that Stefani Germanotta was a man without posting; Rumour, Or simple guessing at the truth. As for MJ he had skin cancer that turns a black persons skin White, he just accomodated those changes. | 2010-01-26 07:57:00 Author: Kern Posts: 5078 |
| no he wasnt, he was poisoned by countless surgeries to turn him white. if it was skin cancer he wouldve died way before he did,also he was a millionaire, anyone with that kind of money can almost do anything | 2010-01-26 08:05:00 Author: Charlemagne Posts: 513 |
| He had skin cancer so he turned himself White to prevent people knowing about it. | 2010-01-26 08:13:00 Author: Kern Posts: 5078 |
| if he had skin cancer his skin wouldve been red. ultraviolet radiation waves from the sun is the only way to get skin cancer. thats what idiots get when they stay out in the sun too long, its just a sunburn they say, oh big deal, well idiot youve just increased your chances of skin cancer, ha youve been UBER PWNED by science! but anyways if he had skin cancer his nose wouldn't have fallen off | 2010-01-26 08:24:00 Author: Charlemagne Posts: 513 |
| /facepalm... | 2010-01-26 08:26:00 Author: Kern Posts: 5078 |
| Epic Win!!!!!!! | 2010-01-26 08:36:00 Author: Charlemagne Posts: 513 |
| I grew up on Michael and until a couple months ago didn't know who Gaga even was. Since then I've listened to Lady G often against my will and don't see what the big deal is. I can understand why people enjoy her music, but I just don't get anything out of it. I feel like she's mostly hype and due to this generations desperation for some pop culture figure to rise up do we get a media built attraction such as her. I mean look at the recent female pop icons prior to gaga and swift? We have Avril Lavigne, Pink, Christina Aguilera, Britney Spears, and a bunch of others I can't even remember. I understand she's supposedly more talented then those women, but like all of them she will most likely fade into black and if not will go down as one of those weirdos in the VH1 flashback docs. Then again maybe she will be this generations Madonna. Who knows. PS. Hopefully I didn't offend anyone. I can see Gaga is a talented artist. She really is. I just personally don't take anything away from listening to her music. | 2010-01-26 10:39:00 Author: fusionboxer  Posts: 37 |
| Ok, Michael Jackson had skin cancer so he got his melanin cells removed thus stopping in his tracks; This also inadvertently made him loose his Black skin Hence his "pale look." He then had Plastic Surgery to change his face so it would look more like a white person, Rather than a White person with a Black persons face. Following me? His nose never fell off that was a joke by the media because of the amount of plastic surgery he had. That is why Michael Jackson was always under a Umbrella because his Melanin which protected him from the Sun had been removed. As for the Pedophilia stuff, That was never proven in court, and the reason why he had sleep overs was to relive his lost childhood which his father had took away from him; As for Stefani Germanotta(Gaga) being a Man previously there has been no actual concrete evidence and only speculation. | 2010-01-26 15:43:00 Author: Kern Posts: 5078 |
| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHS3qJdxefY Thread won. | 2010-01-26 16:51:00 Author: Unknown User |
| >_> video is blocked in my country FAIL http://super-genius.org/images/worst_thread_ever.jpg | 2010-01-26 18:51:00 Author: Pitcard Posts: 779 |
| Personally I'm not a huge fan of Lady GaGa but some music isn't all that bad..... MJ....really couldn't care about him before and now everyone is on their knees crying because he died (And some didn't even know him before he died) his music isn't all that bad either but if you ask me it's kindda......worn out....good back in the day but not as good now right? Not really a fan of either one and I think that comparing these two is like comparing bread and cheese......they don't fit the same category.....MJ did what he did, and GaGa is doing what shes doing......No need to compare 2 very different singers when they don't really go into the same category.... | 2010-01-26 22:48:00 Author: Flare Skull  Posts: 216 |
| Along with Metallica, who have sold well over 100 million. Don't give me that crap. The fact you can even take this thread serioulsy amazes me. Edit: So have ACDC, Led Zeppelin, Queen, Pink Floyd, Guns N Roses, and as much as i hate them, the Beatles are apparently the biggest selling band of all time, with over 600 million sales. So saying MJ is the only artist to sell over 100 million was a bit wrong, no? | 2010-01-27 07:04:00 Author: Unknown User |
| jeez...lady gaga's awful! i don't know how you could compare him to MJ! To be honest though, i'm not a fan of michael but his songs are waaaay better than gaga's. musicaly, mj will always be better than gaga. ALWAYS | 2010-02-06 19:58:00 Author: trip090  Posts: 1562 |
| Can we please lock this... | 2010-02-06 20:27:00 Author: Kern Posts: 5078 |
| How the **** is this not locked yet? | 2010-02-08 17:04:00 Author: Unknown User |
| I don't know how, this must be that new spam can all the kids been talking about...Hate the wallpaper, I'm outta here... | 2010-02-08 20:33:00 Author: Zwollie Posts: 2173 |
| I don't care about either one. My love is with Kenny G. Thank you. | 2010-02-08 21:10:00 Author: Outlaw-Jack  Posts: 5757 |
| Thread locked for being ridiculously off-topic. | 2010-02-09 19:37:00 Author: Killian  Posts: 2575 |
LBPCentral Archive Statistics
Posts: 1077139
Threads: 69970
Members: 9661
Archive-Date: 2019-01-19
Datenschutz
Aus dem Archiv wurden alle persönlichen Daten wie Name, Anschrift, Email etc. - aber auch sämtliche Inhalte wie z.B. persönliche Nachrichten - entfernt.
Die Nutzung dieser Webseite erfolgt ohne Speicherung personenbezogener Daten. Es werden keinerlei Cookies, Logs, 3rd-Party-Plugins etc. verwendet.
Die Nutzung dieser Webseite erfolgt ohne Speicherung personenbezogener Daten. Es werden keinerlei Cookies, Logs, 3rd-Party-Plugins etc. verwendet.