Home Site Stuff Site Feedback
#1
Signature Image Limit?
Archive: 15 posts
Hmm... I don't understand why the max of images is 1. And a smiley counts as an image.. Shouldn't the max be 3 (meaning no smilies)... images? Smilies don't count. | 2009-07-23 20:28:00 Author: Unknown User |
It ensures that the length of your signature is suitable and doesn't lag the forum, which goes in hand with the maximum size of the image used in your signature. As with the emoticons, I never knew they counted as images, and if so it should be counted seperately with a limit of maybe three or four emoticons. Smiley spam is seriously annoying. | 2009-07-23 20:32:00 Author: KoRnDawwg Posts: 1424 |
I think there has to be a balance regarding signatures. On the one hand, it's nice to have the option of having a sig. But three? You have to remember that the site may suffer from a bit of slowdown and possible bandwidth problems if everyone's sig limit was trebled. You've got the use of the gallery for posting multiple images, which can include signatures | 2009-07-23 20:33:00 Author: MrsSpookyBuz Posts: 1492 |
You have to remember that the site may suffer from a bit of slowdown and possible bandwidth problems if everyone's sig limit was trebled. Agreed, though does a signature with an animated gif image in it have the same slowdown/bandwidth effect? Just wondering, could be completely wrong. | 2009-07-23 20:35:00 Author: KoRnDawwg Posts: 1424 |
Well the only thing that lags is you and your internet. Not us, depends on your browser. Especially Chrome, loads fast. Anyways, when I mean 3, I mean like 3 non-gif signatures... especially if you're going to advertise somthing. Example of Smiley Spam: | 2009-07-23 20:39:00 Author: Unknown User |
if u buy one of those profile upgrades doen't that change the size of your sig space????? just adding | 2009-07-23 20:47:00 Author: springs86 Posts: 785 |
Agreed, though does a signature with an animated gif image in it have the same slowdown/bandwidth effect? Just wondering, could be completely wrong. Yes, definitely. It slows the load of the site for others, especially when lots of people have large sigs. That's why the limit is where it's at - we want a fair balance of personalization and usability. | 2009-07-23 20:48:00 Author: ConfusedCartman Posts: 3729 |
Well the only thing that lags is you and your internet. Not us, depends on your browser. Especially Chrome, loads fast. That's precisely what I mean - wouldn't it be better to cater for everyone, regardless of whether they had a slowish modem or a 100meg pipe? I hear what you say, and I don't want to bore everyone, but the sig is there as a nicety - everyone being allowed three seems a bit excessive. | 2009-07-23 20:50:00 Author: MrsSpookyBuz Posts: 1492 |
Well patience is key, no biggie. Just a suggestion. | 2009-07-23 20:50:00 Author: Unknown User |
Well patience is key, no biggie. Just a suggestion. I really don't agree with that in this case. Why should some people have to wait just so others can have flashy signatures? It's not fair and nonsensical. | 2009-07-23 20:51:00 Author: BSprague Posts: 2325 |
Now I see that you're blaming my signature... | 2009-07-23 20:52:00 Author: Unknown User |
leo ur sigs are awesome, three of those would crash my pc or something, lol, just use photoshop or some other program to take three still non animated images and make them into one | 2009-07-23 21:07:00 Author: springs86 Posts: 785 |
3 reasons: 1. Impossible. 2. It'll kill the quality. 3. It's dumb. | 2009-07-24 00:14:00 Author: Unknown User |
3 reasons: 1. Impossible. 2. It'll kill the quality. 3. It's dumb. How is it impossible and how will it kill the quality? Photoshop will only reduce the quality if you choose too, i assume most other programs do the same | 2009-07-24 00:39:00 Author: Dexiro Posts: 2100 |
How is it impossible and how will it kill the quality? Photoshop will only reduce the quality if you choose too, i assume most other programs do the same He's just stomping his feet because he didn't get his way. Anyway, discussion's over - locked. | 2009-07-24 00:41:00 Author: ConfusedCartman Posts: 3729 |
LBPCentral Archive Statistics
Posts: 1077139
Threads: 69970
Members: 9661
Archive-Date: 2019-01-19
Datenschutz
Aus dem Archiv wurden alle persönlichen Daten wie Name, Anschrift, Email etc. - aber auch sämtliche Inhalte wie z.B. persönliche Nachrichten - entfernt.
Die Nutzung dieser Webseite erfolgt ohne Speicherung personenbezogener Daten. Es werden keinerlei Cookies, Logs, 3rd-Party-Plugins etc. verwendet.
Die Nutzung dieser Webseite erfolgt ohne Speicherung personenbezogener Daten. Es werden keinerlei Cookies, Logs, 3rd-Party-Plugins etc. verwendet.